Just caught the latest episode and amidst the awkward goobers and generic indie kidz who make up yer garden variety University Challenge teams in 2009 we have the lascivious square peg in a round hole that is Chantal Hadley (gotta love a bit of brainy posh totty with a common-as-muck name like Chantal) of Jesus College, Oxford.
Myra Hindley in Hoxton? A young Cathy Moriarty (who deez nutz were introduced to when she played Carrigen Crittenden in Casper) playing one of the femme Morrissey doppelgangers in that Smiths video where various Moz-A-likes of both genders ride around Salford? A secretary-by-day/dominatrix-by-night in an old German RTL porn movie on Sky at midnight? Jordan AKA Pamela Rooke if she was an artsy librarian and not an O.G punk who worked at Malcolm McLaren and Vivienne Westwood's SEX boutique? All of the above? I 'unno but she'd definately get the hot-beef jolly hockey stick.
You'd expect a trusty Google for University Challenge contestants to bring up the standard pix with Paxman but my search has bore far juicier fruit. Apparently she's known to do a bit of modelling at Oxford, and not just any ol' two-bit modelling but saucy underwear modelling. Juicy fruit, alas, I can no longer bring to you due to threat of legal action in the comment section (Chantal vanity-googling herself already? Hey, here's an idea : don't let your mate post pictures of you gallivanting around in your knickers on a public Flickr account which comes up as the fourth picture in a Google image search for your name in the first place if Copyright infringement is such an issue, yeah?) but which I feel is my duty to link to since this post is already coming up as the third and fourth results for "Chantal Hadley + University Challenge" on Google.
Cot-damn.
17 comments:
Take this photo down you are in contravention of the Copyright Designs and Patensts Act 1988 by using original or derivative work of another Originator, If you cannot assert written permission to use this photo I would suggest you remove it promptly.
Your blog has been flagged to the appropriate authorities
They see me postin', they hatin'..
It was the photographers who asked for the picture to be removed. The picture is their property after all. They weren't attacking anything else in your post.
Odds on that not being Chantal vanity Googling and this actually being "Nick Atkins Photography" realising he can make coin by selling these photos to the Daily Mail in six weeks time but not if they're available for free online?
For the record, Dom's comment above was posted before i'd approved the 2nd anonymous comment about the photographer wanting it removed but, ding, we have a winner.
Also for the record, I'd like to state here and now that if the bra & knickers picture of Chantal suddenly appears all over Facebook, Digital Spy and that quiz board which CJ from Eggheads moderates with FUCK U NICK ATKINS LOLZ MS-painted on it in the next couple of days then it wasn't me who posted it out of spite as i'd never be so petty.
Oh, be careful what you say.
Defamation law is pretty good in this country. I believe the only criminal offence where the burden of proof, albeit balance of probabilities, is upon the Defendent. Hence presumption of guilt to be disproved. So, be careful what you permit to be posted. You are responsible
Nick wasn't the poster, I am, another copyright owner. I am much more aware of Statute and I have nice people to help me.
The request in the first place was to assert moral rights, so the work could not be taken out of context, which is what most of us wish to be, for the work to be show in context, not mis-represented.
By all means, why not link to the original body of work, and see why Ms Hadley was modelling. And why pick on her? I am sure the other Jesus UC team members would love the chance to get attention similarly in silken undergarments.
I've just posted the modelling pictures on Facebook.
I'm gonna email them to The Mirror too.
*Shaggy* It wasn't me *Shaggy*
For a bitch with a real strong jaw, she's honey.
Is it wrong I fancy her more because she googles herself and uses law terminology?
Ayo Marty baby (if DJ can try something new out can I?), you know where to comment me after uploading onto photobucket.
I think it's this Nick bloke rather than Chantal but if it is her you think she'd be pleased to be in such esteemed company as Vicki C (who's killin' it on the new series of Only Connect), Kate Russell and Suzi Perry in the I hate smart chicks but i love brains series
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grTITen3ehQ
TRU songs can always be relied on to add sound philosophical advice for any situation you may find yourself in.
hahaha @ all of this
you should all buy tickets to oxford fashion week next year so you don't have to use blurry tv shots of hot brainy girls...
I watched University Challenge this week and found Chantal Hadley most attractive, I quickly found these pictures of her: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ofw2009/page5/
She is nice!
typical internet pseudo legal nonsense. Defamation law and liable need proven grounds to bring to court. There is neither here. Read a book people and stop pretending to be a solicitor.
Post a Comment